|
CHILDREN:
Whether or not children benefit depends
on the program strategy and the age of the child.
The AFDC welfare system was originally created in the 1930s to protect
the children of indigent widows. While normative changes in divorce
and out-of-wedlock childbearing dramatically altered the composition
of the welfare rolls, one of welfare's goals has remained the same:
to protect children in poor, usually single-parent families headed
by women. Following dramatic increases in the welfare rolls in the
1970s, however, a new goal was added: to increase parents' employment
and reduce family welfare dependency. The effects on children of
welfare dependency, poverty, and requirements that their mothers
work have been much debated, but there has been little reliable
evidence to provide solid answers. A new generation of program studies
that sheds light on how welfare reform programs affected children's
behavior, development, and progress in school has begun to fill
in the blanks.
Logically, one might expect changes in parental employment and income
to affect children differently depending on their age. For example,
time spent with one's child is thought to be especially important
for infants' and toddlers' development. Parental employment might
be of less concern for elementary school-aged children, as long
as adequate after-school care is available. Teenagers are presumably
self-sufficient when it comes to after-school care, although this
also means they will receive less supervision at an age when youngsters
are more likely to experiment with risky behaviors. For these reasons,
child outcomes are examined separately by age of child.
 |
- Welfare reform programs that led
to increases in mother's employment and income - specifically,
those that included earnings supplements - consistently
improved the school performance of elementary school-age
children. By contrast, work mandates or time limits alone
had few effects on young children; there was no consistent
pattern of benefit or harm. More
- Regardless of program approach,
policies that led to increases in mothers' employment plausibly
led, in turn, to small negative effects on adolescents'
progress in school. On average, however, these policies
did not lead to increases in more serious problems like
school suspensions, dropout rates, or teenage childbearing. More
- The data on infants and toddlers
are too limited to permit definitive conclusions, though
available evidence reveals little systematic harm or benefit
to very young children's later achievement or schooling
when their mothers go to work. More
|
 |
|