|
Working in partnership with others, MDRC has built
an important body of evidence about what works
and doesn't work to address some of society's
toughest problems. Through rigorous research in education,
employment, welfare reform, housing, and programs for
children and youth, MDRC has shown that some programs
can both improve the lives of individuals and be a good
investment of taxpayer dollars. Here are some key lessons
learned from MDRCs research findings, as well as links
to the supporting studies:
Increasing Adult Employment and Earnings
Welfare-to-work programs can increase employment, reduce
welfare dependence, and save taxpayers money, but they
generally do not increase family income.
Policies that supplement the earnings of low-wage workers
can increase employment and income and reduce poverty,
but they typically cost more than traditional welfare
programs.
Mixed welfare-to-work strategies that combine
job search and education or training increase the earnings
of welfare recipients more than either approach alone.
Programs using a mixed approach created more than double
the earnings gains for welfare recipients when compared
to programs using either of the approaches alone.
Strategies that combine employment-related services,
rent breaks as an incentive to work and earn more, and
neighbor-to-neighbor outreach can substantially boost
earnings for the disadvantaged populations living in
public housing.
Unpaid work-experience programs or workfare
have had little effect on increasing employment and
earnings or reducing welfare receipt among participants.
Contrary to some expectations, however, workfare participants
said they found the work meaningful, even though they
learned few skills, and supervisors ranked the quality
of the work performed by workfare participants as similar
to that of paid staff.
Strengthening Schools
Increased investments in career and technical education
with employer involvement during high school can have
a substantial, long-term payoff in the labor market for
young men from low-income communities without reducing
the likelihood that they will enroll in higher education.
Comprehensive school reforms that transform low-performing
high schools into small, supportive learning communities,
enhance math and reading instruction, and provide
professional development to teachers and administrators
can substantially enhance students performance
and their progress toward graduation.
Programs that create small learning communities
and that offer support services for low-income freshmen
at community colleges can substantially improve students
performance during their first semesters, including
taking and passing critical developmental courses
(including English)
Promoting Child Well-Being
Policies that supplement low-income parents
earnings increase their income and employment, while
also helping improve the school readiness and academic
achievement of their preschool and early school-age
children. By contrast, strategies that increase the
employment of working parents without offering earning
supplements do not have the same positive effects.
Welfare-to-work policies have had adverse effects
on some school outcomes among adolescents particularly
for those who had younger siblings. Increased home
responsibilities and sibling care by adolescents,
and reduced monitoring by their parents, are potential
explanations for these negative effects.
Increasing Youth Employment
Use of public funds to create jobs can dramatically
increase employment among at-risk youth and eliminate
some racial disparities in employment.
|