Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work:

4/16/01


Click here to start


Table of Contents

Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work:

The MFIP Model:

The MFIP Evaluation

MFIP Evaluation Looks at Results for Four Groups:

MFIP Substantially Increased Employment and Earnings

MFIP Increased Full-Time and Stable Employment

MFIP Promoted Earnings Growth and Employment in Moderate Quality Jobs

MFIP Increased Welfare Use But Decreased Reliance Solely on Welfare

MFIP Increased Income and Markedly Decreased Poverty

How Might Children Be Affected When Parents Move From Welfare to Work?

MFIP’s Impacts on Other Aspects of Children’s and Families’ Lives

PPT Slide

Who Are Two-Parent Recipient Families in the MFIP Evaluation?

PPT Slide

PPT Slide

MFIP’s Effects on Recent Applicants to Welfare

Benefit-Cost Analysis

PPT Slide

Implications

PPT Slide

The Self- Sufficiency Project at 36 Months MDRC MANPOWER DEMONSTRATION RESEARCH CORPORATION SRDC SOCIAL RESEARCH AND DEMONSTRATION CORPORATION The Self-Sufficiency Project is sponsored by Human Resources Development Canada

Basic Facts About SSP

SSP and MFIP Reward Work (Monthly Income for Single Parent with 2 Children Earning $6/Hour)

Differences between SSP and MFIP in program design

SSP Doubled Full-Time Employment

SSP Increased Earnings and Income

Extra jobs paid close to minimum wage, involved 30 or more hours per week

SSP Promoted Steady Full-Time Work and Growing Wages

Impacts in SSP and MFIP (Long-term welfare recipients only)

Implications

Child Study Sample

Sample and Measures

Impacts on Children

Impacts on Care and Activities

Impacts on Family Functioning

Findings in MFIP and SSP

Conclusion

Author: pontep

Email: virginia_knox@mdrc.org

Home Page: www.mdrc.org/welfare_reform.htm