|
May 2000
|
Food Security and Hunger in Poor, Mother-Headed Families in Four U.S. Cities
Denise F. Polit, Andrew S. London, John M. Martinez
|
 |
|
Despite the strength of the American economy in the past few years, food insecurity
and hunger continue to affect millions of American families. Drawing on 1998-1999
survey and ethnographic data from the Urban Change study (a multicomponent study
of the implementation and effects of welfare reform in four large cities), this
paper describes the food security of mother-headed families who were living in
highly disadvantaged urban neighborhoods and who had received or were currently
receiving cash welfare benefits. The families of four groups of women were compared:
those who, at the time of the interview, worked and were no longer receiving welfare;
those who combined welfare and work; nonworking welfare recipients; and those
who neither worked nor were then receiving welfare. The survey results indicated
that food insecurity in the prior year was high in all groups. Overall, about
half the families were food insecure, and hunger was found in slightly more than
15 percent of the families. Moreover, in nearly one-third of the families there
were food hardships that affected the children’s diets. Food insecurity was most
prevalent among families where the mother had neither employment income nor welfare
benefits. Food insecurity was lowest among the families where the mothers were
working and no longer getting welfare, but even in this group 44.5 percent were
food insecure, and nearly 15 percent had experienced hunger. Data from in-depth
ethnographic interviews indicate that, in this population, women who are food
secure nevertheless expend considerable energy piecing together strategies to
ensure that there is an adequate amount of food available for themselves and their
children.
|
|
 |
Funders
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Ford Foundation, The
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trusts, The George Gund Foundation,
The Joyce Foundation, The Cleveland Foundation, The James Irvine Foundation, The
California Wellness Foundation, The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture
The findings and conclusions presented in this report do not necessarily represent the official positions
or policies of the funders.
|
|