|
Summary of Key Findings from Working Paper No. 13
Background
How have recent changes in the welfare system
affected marriage and cohabitation? While there is some debate
among policymakers and the public about the role of government
in marriage and family formation, there is a clear value in
understanding how new policies affect children’s likelihood
of living in healthy two-parent families. Welfare policy is
an important starting point; a stated goal of the 1996 welfare
reforms was to encourage the formation of two-parent families.
However, recent random assignment studies of welfare and work
programs have found only scattered and inconsistent effects
on marriage, leaving policymakers with little guidance about
whether these new policies are discouraging or promoting marriage.
Understanding the role played by current policies is an important
first step in considering the role interventions specifically
designed to promote marriage might play in the future.
This paper uses meta-analytic techniques to
provide a systematic appraisal of how welfare reform policies
in six studies representing 14 welfare programs have affected
marriage and cohabitation among single-parent families overall
and for a variety of subpopulations. In each of the studies
examined, single parents were randomly assigned to a program
that included some combination of mandatory employment services,
enhanced earnings disregards, time limits on welfare receipt,
or equalized eligibility for two-parent families, or to a
control group that was neither eligible for the program’s
services nor subject to its requirements. Random assignment
ensures that any differences in outcomes for these two groups
over time are attributable to the programs that were studied.
Key Findings
- The vast majority (close to 80 percent)
of the single parents who entered these studies were neither
married nor cohabiting at the time of the survey follow-up
two to four years later.
- On average, these welfare reform programs
had no effect on marriage or cohabitation. Moreover, few
effects were found for specific subpopulations of families.
- Overall, programs with expanded earnings
disregards and, for two-parent families, equalized eligibility
had no effect on marriage or cohabitation either for the
overall sample or for any subgroups of single-parent families.
- Programs that provided expanded earnings
disregards but did not implement welfare time limits produced
a small positive effect on marriage. However, this positive
effect was no longer statistically significant when estimates
from similar types of programs that also provided earnings
supplements were included in the meta-analytic calculation.
- Programs that combined expanded earnings
disregards with time limits on welfare receipt showed a
trend, not statistically significant, toward reductions
in marriage and increases in cohabitation among single parents.
- Programs with only mandatory services
did not affect marriage or cohabitation among the overall
sample. Like the programs with time limits, however, they
showed a slight trend that was not statistically significant
toward reductions in marriage.
Conclusions and Implications
Earlier studies have reported intriguing,
scattered findings of welfare reform program effects on marriage.
However, findings from this meta-analysis suggest that the
programs did not have any consistent effects — at least in
the short run — on marriage and cohabitation for single parents,
whether for overall samples or for subpopulations. It is possible
that different families exhibit countervailing positive and
negative responses to these policies that could not be detected
here (or that these welfare policies increased marital stability
among two-parent families, a group not examined because of
data constraints). Nevertheless, these findings indicate that,
overall, the welfare policies examined are unlikely to be
leading to substantial increases or decreases in single parents’
decisions to marry or cohabit. This suggests that policymakers
who seek to increase the rate of healthy marriages must investigate
policies beyond those examined here. With the support of the
federal government, states are beginning to explore and evaluate
new policies, including counseling, information sharing, and
related interventions designed specifically to foster and
support healthy marriage.
|