 |
Author |
 |
| |
 |
Cynthia Miller
Senior Associate
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
 |
New Hope for the Working Poor
Effects After Eight Years for Families and Children
|
| |
|
|
2008. Cynthia Miller, Aletha C. Huston, Greg J. Duncan, Vonnie C. McLoyd, and Thomas S. Weisner.
Implemented in 1994 in Milwaukee, New Hope provided full-time, low-wage workers with several benefits for three years: an earnings supplement, low-cost health insurance, and subsidized child care. A random assignment study shows positive effects for both adults and children, some of which persisted five years after the program ended.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Implementation and Second-Year Impacts for Lone Parents in the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Demonstration
|
| |
|
|
UK Department for Work and Pensions
2008. James A. Riccio, Helen Bewley, Verity Campbell-Barr, Richard Dorsett, Gayle Hamilton, Lesley Hoggart, Alan Marsh, Cynthia Miller, Kathryn Ray, and Sandra Vegeris.
This report presents new and positive findings on the effects of Britain’s Employment Retention and Advancement demonstration. After two years, the program increased employment and earnings for single-parent participants. ERA offered a combination of job coaching and financial incentives to encourage low-income individuals to sustain employment and progress in work.
|
|
| |
|
 |
New Hope’s Eight-Year Impacts on Employment and Family Income
Working Paper
|
| |
|
|
2008. Greg Duncan, Cynthia Miller, Amy Classens, Mimi Engel, Heather Hill, and Constance Lindsay.
Implemented in 1994, New Hope provided full-time workers with several benefits for three years: an earnings supplement, low-cost health insurance, and subsidized child care. This working paper examines the program’s impacts on employment and earnings, as well as on family income and poverty, up to eight years beyond the point of random assignment.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) Program in New York City
|
| |
|
|
2007. Dan Bloom, Cynthia Miller, and Gilda Azurdia.
A random assignment study of a welfare-to-work program for recipients with work-limiting medical and mental health conditions shows that participants had increased employment and decreased welfare payments.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from Minnesota's Tier 2 Program
|
| |
|
|
2007. Allen LeBlanc, Cynthia Miller, Karin Martinson, and Gilda Azurdia
An evaluation of a case management program for long-term welfare recipients shows little effect on participants’ involvement in program services or on their employment, earnings, or public assistance receipt during the first one-and-a-half years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Challenge of Repeating Success in a Changing World
Final Report on the Center for Employment Training Replication Sites
|
| |
|
|
2005. Cynthia Miller, Johannes M. Bos, Kristin E. Porter, Fannie M. Tseng, and Yasuyo Abe.
The Center for Employment Training (CET) in San Jose, California, produced large, positive employment and earnings effects for out-of-school youth in the late 1980s. However, in this replication study, even the highest-fidelity sites did not increase employment or earnings for youth over the 54-month follow-up period, despite short-term positive effects for women.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Barriers to Employment for Out-of-School Youth
Evidence from a Sample of Recent CET Applicants
Working Paper
|
| |
|
|
2005. Cynthia Miller and Kristin E. Porter.
This working paper examines employment and earnings over a four-year period for a group of disadvantaged out-of-school youth who entered the Evaluation of the Center for Employment Training (CET) Replication Sites between 1995 and 1999. It assesses the importance of three key factors as barriers to employment: lack of a high school diploma, having children, and having an arrest record.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Implementation and First-Year Impacts of the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Demonstration
|
| |
|
|
UK Department for Work and Pensions.
2007. Richard Dorsett, Verity Campbell-Barr, Gayle Hamilton, Lesley Hoggart, Alan Marsh, Cynthia Miller, Joan Phillips, Kathryn Ray, James A. Riccio, Sarah Rich, and Sandra Vegeris.
This report published by the UK Department for Work and Pensions presents encouraging findings on the early effects of Britain’s Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Demonstration. Aimed at helping low-income individuals sustain employment and progress in work, ERA offers a combination of job coaching and financial incentives to participants once they are working.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Turning Welfare into a Work Support
Six-Year Impacts on Parents and Children from the Minnesota Family Investment Program
|
| |
|
|
2005. Lisa A. Gennetian, Cynthia Miller, and Jared Smith.
While positive effects on most parents’ earnings and income faded after six years, young children in some of the most disadvantaged families were still performing better in school than their counterparts in a control group. And, for the most disadvantaged parents, MFIP seems to have created a lasting “leg up” in the labor market.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Stability and Change in Child Care and Employment
Evidence from Three States
Working Paper
|
| |
|
|
2005. Cynthia Miller.
In a study of over 3,500 women in welfare-to-work programs in three states, child care instability did not appear to be a major cause of employment instability.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Interaction of Child Support and TANF
Evidence from Samples of Current and Former Welfare Recipients
|
| |
|
|
2005. Cynthia Miller, Mary Farrell, Maria Cancian, Daniel R. Meyer.
This study suggests that child support can be an important income source and can help welfare recipients move toward self-sufficiency. More generous distribution rules increase payment rates, but many parents still do not understand the distribution rules.
|
|
| |
|
 |
New Hope for Families and Children
Five-Year Results of a Program to Reduce Poverty and Reform Welfare
|
| |
|
|
2003. Aletha C. Huston, Cynthia Miller, Lashawn Richburg-Hayes, Greg J. Duncan, Carolyn A. Eldred, Thomas S. Weisner, Edward Lowe, Vonnie A. McLoyd, Daniella A. Crosby, Marika N. Ripke, Cindy Redcross.
This rigorous long-term evaluation reveals that building a safety net of financial supports for low-income parents who work improved the well-being of their children.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Working with Disadvantaged Youth
Thirty-Month Findings from the Evaluation of the Center for Employment Training Replication Sites
|
| |
|
|
2003. Cynthia Miller, Johannes M. Bos, Kristin E. Porter, Fannie M. Tseng, Fred C. Doolittle, Deana N. Tanguay, Mary P. Vencill.
Efforts to replicate the experience of the Center for Employment Training in San Jose, California — a uniquely successful program that helped at-risk youth develop skills needed to compete in today’s labor market — showed mixed results.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Leavers, Stayers, and Cyclers
An Analysis of the Welfare Caseload
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2002. Cynthia Miller.
Some two million fewer families were receiving welfare benefits in 1999 than in 1994 - a decline of nearly 50 percent in the welfare caseload over the five-year period.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Making Work Pay
Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Long-Term Welfare Recipients
|
| |
|
|
Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.
2002. Charles Michalopoulos, Doug Tattrie, Cynthia Miller, Philip K. Robins, Pamela Morris, David Gyarmati, Cindy Redcross, Kelly Foley, Reuben Ford.
Recognizing that welfare recipients who find jobs may remain poor, the "make work pay" approach rewards those who work by boosting their income. This strategy was the centerpiece of the Self-Sufficiency Project (SSP), a large-scale demonstration program in Canada that offered monthly earnings supplements to single parents who left welfare for full-time work.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Food Stamp Use Among Former Welfare Recipients
|
| |
|
|
2002. Cynthia Miller, Cindy Redcross, Christian Henrichson.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Making Work Pay for Public Housing Residents
Financial-Incentive Designs at Six Jobs-Plus Demonstration Sites
|
| |
|
|
2002. Cynthia Miller, James A. Riccio.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Challenge of Helping Low-Income Fathers Support Their Children
Final Lessons from Parents’ Fair Share
|
| |
|
|
2001. Cynthia Miller, Virginia Knox.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Working and Earning
The Impact of Parents' Fair Share on Low-Income Fathers' Employment
|
| |
|
|
2000. John M. Martinez, Cynthia Miller.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work
A Summary of the Final Report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program
|
| |
|
|
2000. Virginia Knox, Cynthia Miller, Lisa A. Gennetian.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Final Report on the Implementation and Impacts of the Minnesota Family Investment Program in Ramsey County
|
| |
|
|
2000. Patricia Auspos, Cynthia Miller, Jo Anna Hunter.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work
Final Report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program Volume 2 Effects on Children
|
| |
|
|
2000. Lisa Gennetian, Cynthia Miller.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Project Transition
Testing an Intervention to Help High School Freshmen Succeed
|
| |
|
|
1999. Janet C. Quint, Cynthia Miller, Jennifer J. Pastor, Rachel E. Cytron.
Project Transition combines strategies that are becoming more common in K-12 settings across the nation: student-teacher clusters, extra time for teachers to work together, and a teacher "coach" meant to support instructional change
|
|
| |
|
 |
Explaining the Minnesota Family Investment Program's Impacts by Housing Status
|
| |
|
|
1998. Cynthia Miller.
An evaluation of the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP), the state’s welfare waiver program, found that the program produced substantially larger increases in employment and earnings among welfare recipients living in public or subsidized housing than among recipients in private housing. This paper examines several possible reasons that may account for these findings, including differences in characteristics between the two groups of recipients, differences in their proximity to jobs, differences in residential stability, which might aid in the transition to work, and interactions between MFIP's work incentives and the public/subsidized housing rent rules. The evidence, although indirect, suggests that interactions between MFIP rules and the rent rules in public housing helped to produce larger employment impacts for residents in public or subsidized housing.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Building Opportunities, Enforcing Obligations
Implementation and Interim Impacts of Parents' Fair Share
|
| |
|
|
1998. Fred Doolittle, Virginia Knox, Cynthia Miller, Sharon Rowser.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Making Welfare Work and Work Pay
Implementation and 18-Month Impacts of the Minnesota Family Investment Program
|
| |
|
|
1997. Cynthia Miller, Virginia Knox, Patricia Auspos, Jo Anna Hunter-Manns, Alan Orenstein.
|
|
|