 |
Health & Barriers to Employment |
 |
| |
 |
Health and Disabilities |
|
| |
|
 |
|
| |
|
 |
More Than a Job
Final Results from the Evaluation of the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) Transitional Jobs Program
|
| |
|
|
2012. Cindy Redcross, Megan Millenky, Timothy Rudd, and Valerie Levshin.
Ex-prisoners who had access to CEO’s transitional jobs program were less likely to be convicted of a crime and reincarcerated. The effects were particularly large for those ex-prisoners who enrolled in the program shortly after release. The recidivism reductions mean that the program is cost-effective — generating more in savings than it cost.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Alternative Employment Strategies for Hard-to-Employ TANF Recipients
Final Results from a Test of Transitional Jobs and Preemployment Services in Philadelphia
|
| |
|
|
2011. Erin Jacobs and Dan Bloom.
An evaluation of two different welfare-to-work strategies for long-term welfare recipients finds that: (1) transitional jobs substantially increased employment in the short term, but these effects faded after one year, and (2) it is difficult to engage welfare recipients in extensive preemployment services long enough to improve their employability.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Working toward Wellness
Telephone Care Management for Medicaid Recipients with Depression, Thirty-Six Months After Random Assignment
|
| |
|
|
2011. Sue Kim, Allen LeBlanc, Pamela Morris, Greg Simon, and Johanna Walter.
A telephonic care management program increased the use of mental health services by Medicaid recipients with depression while the program was running, but it did not help individuals sustain treatment after the intervention ended. The program did not reduce depression on average, nor did it have any effect on employment outcomes.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Providing Earnings Supplements to Encourage and Sustain Employment
Lessons from Research and Practice
Policy Brief
|
| |
|
|
2011. Karin Martinson and Gayle Hamilton.
This 12-page practitioner brief offers lessons for policy and practice from MDRC-conducted random assignment studies of five programs that provided earnings supplements to low-income parents to encourage employment and increase the payoff of low-wage work.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Accelerated Benefits Demonstration and Evaluation Project
Impacts on Health and Employment at Twelve Months
|
| |
|
|
2011. Charles Michalopoulos, David Wittenburg, Dina A. R. Israel, Jennifer Schore, Anne Warren, Aparajita Zutshi, Stephen Freedman, and Lisa Schwartz.
This demonstration tested the effects of earlier access to health care coverage and related services for new Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries. After one year, the program increased health care use, reduced reported unmet medical needs, and modestly improved health and functioning. It also increased job prep and search activities but did not raise employment levels.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Learning Together
How Families Responded to Education Incentives in New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program
|
| |
|
|
2011. David Greenberg, Nadine Dechausay, and Carolyn Fraker.
Opportunity NYC-Family Rewards was a conditional cash transfer program that provided payments to low-income families for achieving specific health, education, and employment goals. Drawing on in-depth interviews, this report looks at how families viewed the education incentives, communicated about them with their children, reinforced educational rewards, and advanced their quality of life through the program.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Interim Report on the City University of New York’s Project
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2011. Thomas Fraker, Alison Black, Joseph Broadus, Arif Mamun, Michelle Manno, John Martinez, Reanin McRoberts, Anu Rangarajan, and Debbie Reed.
The Youth Transition Demonstration, led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating strategies to help youth with disabilities transition from school to work. Participants in the CUNY project were more likely to have been employed for pay than youth in the control group. However, the project had no impacts on income, expectations, or a composite measure of school enrollment or high school completion.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Interim Report on Colorado Youth WINS
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2011. Thomas Fraker, Peter Baird, Alison Black, Arif Mamun, Michelle Manno, John Martinez, Anu Rangarajan, and Debbie Reed.
The Youth Transition Demonstration, led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating strategies to help youth with disabilities transition from school to work. The implementation of the Colorado project deviated from the YTD model, and, while participants were more likely to have used employment services than youth in the control group, the program had no impacts on employment, income, or other measures.
|
|
| |
|
 |
A Two-Generational Child-Focused Program Enhanced with Employment Services
Eighteen-Month Impacts from the Kansas and Missouri Sites of the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project
|
| |
|
|
2011. JoAnn Hsueh, Erin Jacobs, and Mary Farrell.
The report offers implementation and early impact findings from a random assignment evaluation of two Early Head Start programs that were enhanced with formalized services to proactively address parents’ employment, educational, and self-sufficiency needs.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration's Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Interim Report on Transition WORKS
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2011. Thomas Fraker, Alison Black, Arif Mamun, Michelle Manno, John Martinez, Bonnie O’Day, Meghan O’Toole, Anu Rangarajan, and Debbie Reed.
The Youth Transition Demonstration, led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating strategies to help youth with disabilities transition from school to work. While participants in the Erie County, NY, site were more likely to participate in self-sufficiency services, the program has had no impact on employment or school completion in its first year.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Can Low-Income Single Parents Move Up in the Labor Market?
Findings from the Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Policy Brief
|
| |
|
|
2011. Cynthia Miller, Victoria Deitch, and Aaron Hill.
This 12-page practitioner brief examines the work, education, and training patterns of single parents in the national Employment Retention and Advancement Project, which evaluated strategies to promote employment stability among low-income workers. The findings support other research in underscoring the importance of changing jobs and of access to “good” jobs as strategies to help low-wage workers advance.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Paths to Advancement for Single Parents
|
| |
|
|
2010. Cynthia Miller, Victoria Deitch, and Aaron Hill.
This report from the national Employment Retention and Advancement Project examines the 27,000 single parents who participated in the studied programs to understand the characteristics of those who successfully advanced in the labor market.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Background Characteristics and Patterns of Employment, Earnings, and Public Assistance Receipt of Adults in Two-Parent Families
|
| |
|
|
2010. Sonya Williams and Stephen Freedman.
This report from the national Employment Retention and Advancement Project demonstrates that low-income single-parent and two-parent families have a roughly equivalent need for services to support employment retention and advancement and that this need does not differ substantially between men and women in two-parent families.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Working toward Wellness
Telephone Care Management for Medicaid Recipients with Depression, Eighteen Months After Random Assignment
|
| |
|
|
2010. Sue Kim, Allen LeBlanc, Pamela Morris, Greg Simon, and Johanna Walter.
A telephonic care management program increased the use of mental health services by Medicaid recipients with depression, although that effect faded over time. The program did not reduce depression on average, but it did reduce the number of people who suffered from very severe depression.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Finding the Next Job
Reemployment Strategies in Retention and Advancement Programs for Current and Former Welfare Recipients
Policy Brief
|
| |
|
|
2010. Melissa Wavelet, Karin Martinson, and Gayle Hamilton.
When current and former welfare recipients find jobs, they often lose them quickly and have trouble finding another job. This brief, based on the experiences of 12 programs in the national Employment Retention and Advancement evaluation, offers advice on how to design and implement practices that turn a recent job loss into an opportunity to find a better one.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Recidivism Effects of the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) Program Vary by Former Prisoners’ Risk of Reoffending
|
| |
|
|
2010. Janine Zweig, Jennifer Yahner, and Cindy Redcross.
CEO, a transitional jobs program for former prisoners in New York City, had its strongest effects for participants who were at highest risk of recidivism, for whom CEO reduced the probability of rearrest, the number of rearrests, and the probability of reconviction two years after entering the program.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Different Settings, Common Strategy
Using Earnings Supplements to Improve Employment Retention and Advancement Programs in Texas and the United Kingdom
|
| |
|
|
2010. Erika Lundquist and Tatiana Homonoff.
Although much is known about how to help welfare recipients find jobs, there is less hard evidence about what can be done to help current and former recipients and other low-wage workers stay employed or advance in the labor market. This paper looks closely at one strategy — providing earnings supplements, or stipends, to current and former welfare recipients who maintain stable full-time employment — that was used at sites in Texas and in the United Kingdom.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Benefit-Cost Findings for Three Programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Project
|
| |
|
|
2010. Cindy Redcross, Victoria Deitch, and Mary Farrell.
This report examines the financial benefits and costs of three different programs in the national Employment Retention and Advancement project, sponsored by the federal Administration for Children and Families, that have increased employment and earnings among current and former welfare recipients.
|
|
| |
|
 |
How Effective Are Different Approaches Aiming to Increase Employment Retention and Advancement?
Final Impacts for Twelve Models
|
| |
|
|
2010. Richard Hendra, Keri-Nicole Dillman, Gayle Hamilton, Erika Lundquist, Karin Martinson, and Melissa Wavelet.
This report presents the final implementation and impact findings for 12 programs in the national Employment Retention and Advancement project, sponsored by the federal Administration for Children and Families. These programs attempted to promote steady work and career advancement for current and former welfare recipients and other low-wage workers, most of whom were single mothers.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Providing Health Benefits and Work-Related Services to Social Security Disability Insurance Beneficiaries
Six-Month Results from the Accelerated Benefits Demonstration
Policy Brief
|
| |
|
|
2010. David Wittenburg, Anne Warren, Deborah Peikes, and Stephen Freedman.
This policy brief offers early findings from a demonstration testing whether earlier access to health care and related services for new Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries who lack health care coverage would lead to improved outcomes. So far, the intervention has increased the use of health care services and reduced the reported unmet health care needs of the project participants.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Transitional Jobs
Background, Program Models, and Evaluation Evidence
|
| |
|
|
2010. Dan Bloom.
Transitional jobs programs provide temporary, wage-paying jobs and other services to help individuals who have difficulty succeeding in the regular labor market. In the context of a new federal initiative to support and study these programs, this paper describes what is known about transitional jobs and offers ideas for program design and research.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Toward Reduced Poverty Across Generations
Early Findings from New York City’s Conditional Cash Transfer Program
|
| |
|
|
2010. James Riccio, Nadine Dechausay, David Greenberg, Cynthia Miller, Zawadi Rucks, and Nandita Verma.
Targeted toward low-income families in six high-poverty New York City communities, Opportunity NYC-Family Rewards offers cash payments tied to efforts and achievements in children’s education, family preventive health care practices, and parents’ employment. In its first two years, the program substantially reduced poverty and material hardship and had positive results in improving some education, health-related, and work-related outcomes.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Implementation Lessons from the Original Projects
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2010. John Martinez, Thomas Fraker, Michelle Manno, Peter Baird, Arif Mamun, Bonnie O’Day, Anu Rangarajan, and David Wittenburg.
The Youth Transition Demonstration, led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating promising strategies to help youth with disabilities become as economically self-sufficient as possible as they transition from school to work. This report offers six overall implementation lessons to help policymakers and administrators develop, fund, and provide interventions for youth with disabilities.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Los Angeles Reach for Success Program
|
| |
|
|
2009. Jacquelyn Anderson, Stephen Freedman, and Gayle Hamilton.
A program in Los Angeles offering individualized and flexible case management services to working welfare recipients did not substantially increase the use of work-based services by participants – and did not lead to greater employment or higher earnings than did the county’s existing postemployment program.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Alternative Welfare-to-Work Strategies for the Hard-to-Employ
Testing Transitional Jobs and Pre-Employment Services in Philadelphia
|
| |
|
|
2009. Dan Bloom, Sarah Rich, Cindy Redcross, Erin Jacobs, Jennifer Yahner, and Nancy Pindus.
Interim results from an evaluation of two different welfare-to-work strategies for long-term welfare recipients show that transitional jobs increase employment and earnings but that it is difficult to successfully engage participants in extensive pre-employment services.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Findings for the Eugene and Medford, Oregon, Models
Implementation and Early Impacts for Two Programs That Sought to Encourage Advancement Among Low-Income Workers
|
| |
|
|
2009. Frieda Molina, Mark van Dok, Richard Hendra, Gayle Hamilton, and Wan-Lae Cheng.
While these two different programs in the Employment Retention and Advancement Project both increased service receipt, neither had effects on job retention or advancement after 1.5 years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Transitional Jobs for Ex-Prisoners
Implementation, Two-Year Impacts, and Costs of the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) Prisoner Reentry Program
|
| |
|
|
2009. Cindy Redcross, Dan Bloom, Gilda Azurdia, Janine Zweig, and Nancy Pindus.
A random assignment study shows that participants in CEO’s transitional jobs program were less likely to be convicted of a crime, to be admitted to prison for a new conviction, or to be incarcerated for any reason in prison or jail over the first two years. The program also had a large but short-lived impact on employment.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Working toward Wellness
Early Results from a Telephone Care Management Program for Medicaid Recipients with Depression
|
| |
|
|
2009. Sue Kim, Allen LeBlanc, and Charles Michalopoulos.
Very early results from a random assignment study suggest that Working toward Wellness increased the use of mental health services and had mixed effects on depression severity. Impacts are concentrated among Hispanic participants.
|
|
| |
|
 |
A Preliminary Look at Early Educational Results of the Opportunity NYC – Family Rewards Program
A Research Note for Funders
|
| |
|
|
2009. Cynthia Miller, James Riccio, and Jared Smith.
Targeted toward very low-income families in six high-poverty New York City communities, Family Rewards offers cash payments tied to efforts and achievements in children’s education, family preventive health care practices, and parents’ employment. This paper reviews data on participants’ receipt of rewards and offers preliminary estimates of the program’s impacts on selected educational outcomes during the first year.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Substance Abuse Case Management Program in New York City
|
| |
|
|
2009. John Martinez, Gilda Azurdia, Dan Bloom, and Cynthia Miller.
Participants in an intensive care management program for public assistance recipients with substance abuse problems were slightly more likely to enroll in treatment than participants in less intensive services. However, the intensive program had no effects on employment or public benefit receipt among the full sample.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Findings for the Cleveland Achieve Model
Implementation and Early Impacts of an Employer-Based Approach to Encourage Employment Retention Among Low-Wage Workers
|
| |
|
|
2008. Cynthia Miller, Vanessa Martin, and Gayle Hamilton, with Lauren Cates and Victoria Deitch.
An on-site program at long-term nursing care facilities had little effect overall on retention of low-wage employees, aside from a small increase in retention in the short term and among subgroups with particularly high turnover rates.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Profiles of the Random Assignment Projects
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2009. John Martinez, Michelle S. Manno, Peter Baird, Thomas Fraker, Todd Honeycutt, Arif Mamun, Bonnie O’Day, and Anu Rangarajan.
The transition to adulthood for youth with disabilities, particularly youth receiving disability program benefits, can be especially challenging. The Youth Transition Demonstration, led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating six promising strategies to help youth with disabilities become as economically self-sufficient as possible as they transition from school to work.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Social Security Administration’s Youth Transition Demonstration Projects
Evaluation Design Report
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Social Security Administration
2009. Anu Rangarajan, Thomas Fraker, Todd Honeycutt, Arif Mamun, John Martinez, Bonnie O’Day, and David Wittenburg.
The Youth Transition Demonstration (YTD), led by Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, and TransCen, Inc., is developing and evaluating six promising strategies to help youth with disabilities become as economically self-sufficient as possible as they transition from school to work. This report presents a detailed, comprehensive design for the YTD evaluation.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Health Benefits for the Uninsured
Design and Early Implementation of the Accelerated Benefits Demonstration
Policy Brief
|
| |
|
|
2008. David Whittenburg, Peter Baird, Lisa Schwartz, and David Butler.
Many Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries have serious and immediate health care needs, but, under current law, most are not eligible for Medicare until 24 months after they start receiving cash benefits. This policy brief describes a new project that is testing whether providing earlier access to health benefits, as well as other services, for new SSDI beneficiaries who have no other health insurance improves employment and health outcomes.
|
|
| |
|
 |
A Comparison of Two Job Club Strategies
The Effects of Enhanced Versus Traditional Job Clubs in Los Angeles
|
| |
|
|
2008. David Navarro, Gilda Azurdia, and Gayle Hamilton.
This report, from the Employment Retention and Advancement Project, finds that unemployed welfare recipients in an enhanced job club had no better employment outcomes than participants in a traditional job club. At the end of the 18-month follow-up period, about half of both groups were employed.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Valuing Individual Success and Increasing Opportunities Now (VISION) Program in Salem, Oregon
|
| |
|
|
2008. Frieda Molina, Wan-Lae Cheng, and Richard Hendra.
A program to promote better initial job placements, employment retention, and advancement among unemployed applicants to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program faced implementation challenges and had no employment-related impacts after one year of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from Two Education and Training Models for Employed Welfare Recipients in Riverside, California
|
| |
|
|
2007. David Navarro, Stephen Freedman, and Gayle Hamilton.
Two education and training programs for employed, single-parent welfare recipients had small impacts on attendance in basic education or training overall but had larger impacts for disadvantaged groups. However, over two years, neither program increased employment and earnings levels overall or for any subgroup.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Impacts for Portland's Career Builders Program
|
| |
|
|
2008. Gilda Azurdia and Zakia Barnes.
A program in Portland, Oregon, to remove employment barriers and assist with job placement and employment retention and advancement for welfare applicants and recipients was never fully implemented and, not surprisingly, had no any effects on employment, earnings, or receipt of public assistance.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Transitional Jobs for Ex-Prisoners
Early Impacts from a Random Assignment Evaluation of the Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) Prisoner Reentry Program
Working Paper
|
| |
|
|
2007. Dan Bloom, Cindy Redcross, Janine Zweig (Urban Institute), and Gilda Azurdia.
After one year, CEO’s transitional jobs program generated a large but short-lived increase in employment for ex-prisoners. A subgroup of recently released prisoners showed positive effects on recidivism: They were less likely to have their parole revoked, to be convicted of a felony, and to be reincarcerated than the control group.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Four Strategies to Overcome Barriers to Employment
An Introduction to the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project
|
| |
|
|
2007. Dan Bloom, Cindy Redcross, JoAnn Hsueh, Sarah Rich, and Vanessa Martin.
This demonstration is evaluating four diverse strategies designed to improve employment and other outcomes for low-income parents and others who face serious barriers to employment.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) Program in New York City
|
| |
|
|
2007. Dan Bloom, Cynthia Miller, and Gilda Azurdia.
A random assignment study of a welfare-to-work program for recipients with work-limiting medical and mental health conditions shows that participants had increased employment and decreased welfare payments.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Post-Assistance Self-Sufficiency (PASS) Program in Riverside, California
|
| |
|
|
2007. David Navarro, Mark van Dok, and Richard Hendra.
A random assignment evaluation of a voluntary postemployment program for workers who recently left welfare shows participants had increased employment and earnings during the first two years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from Minnesota's Tier 2 Program
|
| |
|
|
2007. Allen LeBlanc, Cynthia Miller, Karin Martinson, and Gilda Azurdia
An evaluation of a case management program for long-term welfare recipients shows little effect on participants’ involvement in program services or on their employment, earnings, or public assistance receipt during the first one-and-a-half years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Chicago ERA Site
|
| |
|
|
2006. Dan Bloom, Richard Hendra, and Jocelyn Page.
An evaluation of a retention and advancement program for recently employed welfare recipients shows modest increases in employment and large reductions in welfare receipt during the first two years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the Texas ERA Site
|
| |
|
|
2006. Karin Martinson and Richard Hendra.
An evaluation of a job placement, retention, and advancement program for individuals receiving welfare showed some effects — but not consistent or large effects — on employment and retention outcomes during the first two years of follow-up.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Power of Work
The Center for Employment Opportunities Comprehensive Prisoner Reentry Program
|
| |
|
|
2006. The Center for Employment Opportunities and MDRC.
The Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) serves nearly 2,000 reentering prisoners a year with a structured program of pre-employment training, immediate short-term transitional work, and job placement services. This report, written jointly by CEO and MDRC, describes how the CEO program operates. Results from a random assignment evaluation by MDRC are expected next year.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Results from the South Carolina ERA Site
|
| |
|
|
2005. Susan Scrivener, Gilda Azurdia, and Jocelyn Page.
An MDRC evaluation of Moving Up, a program in South Carolina that aimed to help former welfare recipients obtain jobs, work more steadily, and move up in the labor market, found that the program had little effect on employment rates, earnings, employment retention, or advancement.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Employment Retention and Advancement Project
Early Results from Four Sites
|
| |
|
|
2005. Dan Bloom, Richard Hendra, Karin Martinson, and Susan Scrivener.
Early results are mixed for Employment Retention and Advancement project programs in four sites, but programs in two sites appear to help some welfare recipients work more steadily and advance to higher-paying jobs.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Service Delivery and Institutional Linkages
Early Implementation Experiences of Employment Retention and Advancement Programs
|
| |
|
|
2003. Jacquelyn Anderson, Karin Martinson.
Describing the initial experiences of 15 Employment Retention and Advancement programs in 8 states, this report emphasizes implementation issues and focuses on connections among the agencies and institutions that deliver retention and advancement services to low-income workers and hard-to-employ populations.
|
|
| |
|
 |
New Strategies to Promote Stable Employment and Career Progression
An Introduction to the Employment Retention and Advancement Project
|
| |
|
|
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2002. Dan Bloom, Jacquelyn Anderson, Melissa Wavelet, Karen N. Gardiner, Michael E. Fishman.
Welfare reform has resulted in millions of low-income parents replacing the receipt of public cash assistance with income from employment. But what strategies will help the new workforce entrants find more stable jobs, advance in the labor market, and achieve long-term self-sufficiency? The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) evaluation is a comprehensive effort to explore this urgent public policy question.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Impacts of Transitional Employment for Mentally Retarded Young Adults
Results of the STETS Demonstration
|
| |
|
|
1985. Stuart Kerachsky, Craig Thornton, Anne Bloomenthal, Rebecca Maynard, Susan Stephens.
|
|
| |
|
 |
A Transitional Employment Strategy for the Mentally Retarded
The Final STETS Implementation Report
|
| |
|
|
1984. James A. Riccio with Marilyn L. Price.
|
|
| |
|
 |
After Supported Work
Post-Program Interviews with a Sample of AFDC Welfare Participants
|
| |
|
|
1983. Martha Ritter, Sandra Danziger.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Supported Work for the Mentally Retarded
Launching the STETS Demonstration
|
| |
|
|
1982. MDRC.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Supported Work Youth Variation
An Enriched Program for Young High School Drop-outs
|
| |
|
|
1981. Vicki Scharfman.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Supported Work Evaluation
Final Benefit-Cost Analysis
|
| |
|
|
1981. Peter Kemper, David Long, Craig Thornton with Robinson Hollister, Valerie Leach, Felicity Skidmore, Christine Whitebread, David Zimmerman.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Impact of Supported Work on Ex-Addicts
|
| |
|
|
1981. Katherine Dickinson, Rebecca Maynard with Randall Brown, Rosemary Gartner, Valerie Leach, Stan Masters, Liz Milor, Anne Mozer, Irving Piliavin, Jennifer Schore.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Impact of Supported Work on Long-Term Recipients of AFDC Benefits
|
| |
|
|
1981. Stanley Masters, Rebecca Maynard with Randall Brown, Jennifer Schore.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Impact of Supported Work on Ex-Offenders
|
| |
|
|
1981. Irving Piliavin, Rosemary Gartner with Valerie Leach, Rebecca Maynard, Randall Brown, Katherine Dickinson, Michael Dunham, Stan Masters, Joan Mattei, Anne Mozer, Tim Sayles, Jennifer Schore, Michael Sherman.
|
|
| |
|
 |
The Impact of Supported Work on Young School Dropouts
|
| |
|
|
1980. Rebecca Maynard with Randall Brown, Anne Mozer, Irving Piliavin, jennifer Schore, Katherine Dickinson, Stanley Masters, Joan Mattei.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Summary and Findings of the National Supported Work Demonstration
|
| |
|
|
1980. The MDRC Board of Directors.
|
|