The SNAP Employment and Training Evaluation

Project

Overview

Project Overview

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) — formerly the food stamp program —is a critical work support for low-income people and families. Although SNAP has included various employment and training requirements for adult recipients to maintain their eligibility since the 1970s, the SNAP Employment and Training (SNAP E&T) program was established as part of the Food Security Act of 1985 and largely focuses on able-bodied adults without dependents as part of the 1996 welfare reform legislation. The purpose of the SNAP E&T program is to help recipients meet work requirements and gain the skills, training, or experience they might need to increase their ability to obtain regular employment and increase their income. The SNAP E&T program is administered on the federal level by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service.

The SNAP E&T evaluation was authorized by the Agricultural Act of 2014. This “farm bill” provided a total of $200 million to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to fund up to 10 new SNAP employment and training pilot projects and to evaluate their effectiveness. The SNAP E&T pilot projects funded through these grants are developing and testing new ways that SNAP E&T programs and services might increase the number of SNAP work registrants who obtain unsubsidized employment, increase their earned income, and reduce their reliance on public assistance.

An evaluation team, including researchers from Mathematica Policy Research, MDRC, Insight Policy Research, Kone Consulting, and DIR, are conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of each of the 10 new SNAP E&T pilot programs to assess the extent to which the new types of job search, training, education, case management, and other services help SNAP recipients. MDRC is leading the RCTs in four of the 10 sites — in Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, and Virginia. The evaluation results will help federal, state, and local policymakers learn what might best help SNAP recipients obtain employment and increase their earnings.

STATUS: Current

Basics

Issue: Work and Income Security

Focus Area: Job Retention and Advancement, Welfare Reform, Work Support and Asset Building

Population: Low-Income Populations

Focus Population: Low-Wage Workers, Welfare Recipients, The Unemployed

Locations: Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Virginia

Intervention: Reemployment Programs, Career & Technical Education, Job Training, Employment Services

Agenda, Scope, <br> & Goals

Agenda, Scope, and Goals

The SNAP E&T evaluation is a random assignment research study. MDRC is collaborating with Mathematica Policy Research, which is the primary and lead organization on the project. Components of the evaluation include an implementation study and participation, impact, and benefit-cost analyses.

The research questions for each pilot site are:

What new SNAP E&T pilot services are put into place, and how? To what extent do individuals participate in the new offered services? Are individuals with certain characteristics and backgrounds more likely to take up the services than others? How long do individuals participate in the services?
Do the new SNAP E&T pilot programs result in individuals being more likely to receive services, receive different types of services, or stay longer in services — compared with any employment and training services that individuals can currently receive?
Do the new SNAP E&T pilot services improve SNAP recipients’ outcomes related to employment, income, reliance on SNAP or other types of benefits, and food security — compared with other employment and training services that individuals can currently receive? If so, how long does it take for such improvements to emerge? Are the improvements larger for individuals with certain characteristics and backgrounds? Do some services generally seem to be more effective than others?
How much does it cost to deliver the new SNAP E&T pilot services? How do the services’ benefits compare with their costs?

STATUS: Current

Basics

Issue: Work and Income Security

Focus Area: Job Retention and Advancement, Welfare Reform, Work Support and Asset Building

Population: Low-Income Populations

Focus Population: Low-Wage Workers, Welfare Recipients, The Unemployed

Locations: Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Virginia

Intervention: Reemployment Programs, Career & Technical Education, Job Training, Employment Services

Design, Sites, & <br> Data Sources

Design, Sites, and Data Sources

In 2015, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service competitively selected and funded 10 pilot projects; the projects operate in the following states: California, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington. MDRC is leading the RCTs in 4 of the 10 states — Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, and Virginia. As part of the evaluation, all pilot projects are receiving technical assistance with implementing the new E&T services from the evaluation team.

The evaluation team is rigorously measuring the effects of the new pilot services through a randomized controlled trial in each of the 10 states. In this design, SNAP applicants and recipients who are eligible for the new SNAP E&T pilot services will be randomly assigned to one of two or more research groups: a group eligible for the usual SNAP employment and training services; a group eligible for the new SNAP E&T pilot services; or, possibly, a group eligible for a somewhat different version of the new SNAP E&T pilot services. By comparing the employment, earnings, SNAP receipt, and other outcomes of the groups over time, the evaluation team will measure the extent to which the new SNAP E&T pilot services help people more than the usual SNAP E&T services, and determine whom the new services help most.

The evaluation will analyze a variety of data: baseline data collected at the time of random assignment, program activity data from each site, and administrative data (for instance, SNAP receipt data, welfare receipt records, and unemployment insurance wage records data). In addition, two follow-up surveys will be conducted for a subsample of study participants (one at

12 months after their study entry and second one at 36 months, with a possibility of a third follow-up survey at 60 months).

In addition, detailed information will be collected on the implementation of the pilot services through three rounds of site visit interviews with program staff and through participant focus groups. Collected cost data will include program financial data and staff time-use surveys.

STATUS: Current

Basics

Issue: Work and Income Security

Focus Area: Job Retention and Advancement, Welfare Reform, Work Support and Asset Building

Population: Low-Income Populations

Focus Population: Low-Wage Workers, Welfare Recipients, The Unemployed

Locations: Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Virginia

Intervention: Reemployment Programs, Career & Technical Education, Job Training, Employment Services

Funders & <br />Partners

Funders

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service

Partners

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Insight Policy Research

Koné Consulting

Decision Information Resources (DIR)

MDRC Staff

Gayle Hamilton
Senior Fellow, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Hamilton has designed, implemented, and directed numerous large-scale evaluations and demonstrations of programs intended to improve the well-being of low-income populations.
More »
Barbara S. Goldman
Vice President, Director of Deployment and Accountability
As vice president for accountability and deployment, Goldman is a member of MDRC’s corporate management team, responsible for assessing staffing needs and leading MDRC’s Quality Assurance and Risk Management program covering all of
More »
Frieda Molina
Deputy Director, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Molina has over 20 years of experience providing technical and operational assistance to workforce development service providers, and has worked at MDRC for 17 years on numerous workforce development evaluations.
More »
Donna Wharton-Fields
Senior Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Wharton-Fields, a Senior Operations Associate, has more than 15 years of experience in community development and urban planning.
More »
Stephen Freedman
Senior Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Freedman manages the collection and assembly of data from surveys and administrative records and the programming of large multisource data sets to study the use of program services, employment behavior, household income, assets and debt, and other indicators of financial well-being for low- and m
More »
Richard Hendra
Senior Fellow, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
During his tenure at MDRC, Hendra has played central roles in the quantitative analysis of a range of welfare, asset-building, and workforce-development projects.
More »
David Navarro
Research Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Navarro, a research associate in MDRC’s California office, has over 31 years of experience as an information services and operations liaison for over 60 sites, covering 21 evaluations and demonstrations of innovative programs to help low-income people become self-suffici
More »
Alexandra Pennington
Research Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Pennington joined MDRC in 2006. She has been involved in many aspects of MDRC’s research, including program start-up, survey development, data management, implementation and impact analyses, report writing, and technical assistance with data.
More »
Susan Scrivener
Senior Associate, Postsecondary Education Policy Area
Scrivener has over two decades of experience evaluating educational and social programs for low-income individuals. She currently focuses primarily on directing projects and doing research on how programs are implemented.
More »
Betsy L. Tessler
Research Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Tessler has more than 15 years of experience with operations and implementation research at MDRC, focusing primarily on employment, training, and work-support use among low-wage workers and individuals receiving housing and food assistance.
More »
Jonathan Bigelow
Research Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Bigelow works to design, assess, and strengthen human services programs and systems in a variety of areas.
More »
Keith Olejniczak
Research Analyst, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Olejniczak assists with study design, works closely with program staff members to provide program and evaluation support, creates tools for monitoring program and study implementation, and plans and conducts field research.
More »
Kelsey Schaberg
Research Associate, Low-Wage Workers and Communities Policy Area
Schaberg, a quantitative researcher in the Low-Wage Workers and Communities policy area, joined MDRC in 2012.
More »

Project Director

Search form

Want to learn more about this and related topics?

Project

STATUS: Current

Basics

STATUS: Current

Basics

STATUS: Current

Basics