In this commentary published by Spotlight on Poverty, MDRC President Gordon Berlin makes the case for creating a more flexible safety net that continues to reward work when jobs are plentiful, provides employment to poor families when jobs disappear, and begins to address the problem of stagnant wages at the low end of the labor market.
Using an alternative to classical statistics, this paper reanalyzes results from three published studies of interventions to increase employment and reduce welfare dependency. The analysis formally incorporates prior beliefs about the interventions, characterizing the results in terms of the distribution of possible effects, and generally confirms the earlier published findings.
New Directions in Evaluations of American Welfare-to-Work and Employment Initiatives
The Effects of Program Management and Services, Economic Environment, and Client Characteristics
Planning for the Jobs-Plus Demonstration
Statistical Implications for the Evaluation of Education Programs